Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sho Shimabukuro vs Ray Ho Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimabukuro vs Ho analysis and find out who is favored!
Sho Shimabukuro vs Ray Ho Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shimabukuro 1 - 0 Ho
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimabukuro has won 50.86% of points on their second serve, while Ho has won 38.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimabukuro, in recent form, has won 48.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ho has won 50.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.5% and 33.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimabukuro has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ho has saved 51.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimabukuro has won 49.15% of matches played (W/L 29/ 30), with Ho winning 50% (W/L 20/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19). Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.52% of matches (W/L 17/ 16), where as Ho has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimabukuro winning 1 times and Ho being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 2 and Ho winning 1. The last match between Shimabukuro and Ho was at the M15 Jakarta, 21-08-2019, First, Hard with Sho Shimabukuro getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(2) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimabukuro and Ho have played a deciding set 1 times, with Shimabukuro winning 1 times and Ho 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Shimabukuro winning 1, and Ho 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimabukuro has played against opponents with an average rank of 298.24 while Ho has played against players with an average rank of 189.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimabukuro has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ho has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimabukuro has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ho has converted 37.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
215
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
715
High
24
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
62% (217-134)
Career Total W/L
53% (132-119)
32% (7-15)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$196,505
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro VS Ho H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Ray Ho |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (70/119) | 62% (70/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (49/70) | 70% (49/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (27/49) | 47% (20/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (44/113) | 36% (43/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Shimabukuro VS Ho H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats 
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ray Ho
59%
(
70 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Ray Ho |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (7/15) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (20/30) | 51% (19/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (225/253) | 52% (171/158) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:31 | 1:2:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.14 | 141.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (867/1510) | 67% (511/761) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (596/867) | 62% (318/511) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (327/643) | 39% (97/250) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (47/95) | 38% (25/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (491/1410) | 38% (268/705) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (7/21) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Stuart Parker
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
17
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ray Ho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Ray Ho
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Ray Ho
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Ray Ho
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Ray Ho
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Sanhui Shin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
83%
(
68 of
82)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Matsumura
Player
Ray Ho
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ray Ho
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
107)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimabukuro Vs Ho Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Shimabukuro are available here and Ho photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sho Shimabukuro
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
